In the previous installment of this series I examined Muslim Wiki's claim that Native American languages and tribal names showed a clear Islamic or Arabic influence.
Now let's take a look at some of Muslim Wiki's other statements.
Mulsim Wiki makes repeated reference to black Muslim slaves transported to the New World. By their own estimate, 10-30% of all black slaves were Muslim. Fair enough. But in Muslim Wiki's narrative, runaway slaves brought Islam to Native Americans.
And there the logic begins to erode.
Let's look at this mathematically for a moment. If 30% of the slaves were Muslim- Muslim Wiki's highest estimate- then 70% were non-Muslim. Given a roughly equal rate of escape, this would mean the 3 in 10 runaway slaves were Muslim and 7 in 10 were non-Muslim. This would seem to make the non-Muslim influence on Native Americans far greater than the Muslim influence. Are we meant to infer that Native Americans instinctively rejected non-Muslim runaways in favor of Muslim runaways?
To bolster this claim, Muslim Wiki notes that an 1835 census lists 10% of the Cherokee Nation as being of African descent. This is not surprising given that, until 1866, some of the Cherokee were slave owners. Is Muslim Wiki suggesting that Muslim slaves converted their owners?
The authors at Muslim Wiki do not content themselves with speculating about language origins and slave populations, however. They are eager to claim both legal documents and historical figures, and here the site crosses the line from wishful thinking to outright falsehood.
Let me give you just two examples:
Under the heading "American Treaties and Laws with American Muslims," Muslim Wiki lists The Treaty of Peace and Commerce "signed in the Delaware river in 1787, which bears the signature of Abdel Khak and Muhammad Ibn Abdullah."
The Treaty of Peace and Commerce is part of the Barbary Treaties, which were negotiated between the United States and Morocco. It was signed by Taher Ben Abdelhack Fennish (Abdel Khak) on behalf of the Kingdom of Morocco and Thomas Barclay on behalf of the United States. Muhammad III was the ruler of Morocco at the time. It has nothing whatever to do with any Muslims living in the United States and was not "signed in the Delaware river" (although that is an arresting mental image).
The complete Treaty of Peace and Commerce- in fact, all the Barbary Treaties- have been placed online by the Avalon Project at Yale Law School.
Muslim Wiki also posts a brief list of names under the heading "Famous Native American Muslims." I scanned the list and one name leapt out: "Ramadhan Ibn Wati of the Cherokees in 1866."
I showed this list to a friend of mine who is a Civil War buff. He burst out laughing on the spot. When he calmed down he began fetching history books.
"Wati of the Cherokees" is known to legitimate historians as Stand Watie, the only Native American to achieve the rank of General in the Civil War. He was born at Oothcaloga in what was then the Cherokee Nation in 1806. His family name was also known as Oowatie. "Stand" derives from the translation of his Cherokee name, De-ga-ta-ga, meaning "He stands" or "He stands firm." He also used the English name Isaac S. Watie. Watie attended the Moravian Mission School (a Christian academy) and became an important political voice in the Cherokee Nation.
He was never known as Ramadhan Ibn Watie, either during his life or after, and he was never a Muslim. That is simply a lie.
The issue of slavery caused a painful split in the Cherokee Nation, just as it did in the United States. Watie and his family were slave owners and Watie served with the Confederate Army, participating in 18 battles. The date '1866' affixed to his name by Muslim Wiki probably refers to the Cherokee Reconstruction Treaty of 1866, which he helped to negotiate.
In 1866 the Cherokee adopted their freed slaves, granting them citizenship in the Cherokee Nation, but it appears tensions persisted; in March of this year the Cherokee Nation voted to revoke the tribal membership of the slave's descendants.
I find it curious that Muslim Wiki would first assert that runaway slaves spread Islam to Native American tribes, then try to claim as a Muslim a Native American slave owner who fought to preserve the institution of slavery. Where do such wild fairy tales come from? In the next section we'll take a look at some of Muslim Wiki's sources.
References
Avalon Project Collection of Barbary Treaties
Biography of Stand Watie at NativeAmericans.com
The Civil War: A Narrative-Fort Sumter to Perryville vol. 1/Shelby Foote (reference to Stand Watie on pg. 286 of paperback edition.)
What are you so afraid of...discovering the truth? Why don't you read more, PROPERLY, before spouting your silliness. Probably you are incapable of sensible discussion....that must be it.
Islam reached the 'Americas' well before the Spanish arrived with Muslims travelling from the western shores of Europe and Africa. They integrated with the native people they found there developing trade and cultural links. They intermarried and have blood ties with what are today called Native Americans. The Human Genome project on DNA will, no doubt, highlight this fact for those who have some wisdom and understanding. EEk, you must be so closed off and ignorant, open your mind heart, if you have one.
Posted by: ruby | January 26, 2009 at 02:29 PM
Ibn means "Son of"; so this Ramadhan is the "Son of" Watie of the Cherokees, and not Watie himself.
Posted by: khairy.alonto | February 09, 2009 at 04:25 PM
Ruby's faith-based approach to cultural anthropology leaves a lot to be desired.
I had a professor who called this methodology "proof by hand-waving."
Posted by: Prime Director | February 15, 2009 at 05:13 AM
I don't know if you've looked furter that just muslimwiki
because all you're saying is wrong
The runaway slave did not bring the islam in america
the moors did and there a lot of evidence about that.
And the Arabs aready knew that the world was round.
In fact a hole lot of peolpe knew that before Columbus : The Chinese
The Aboriginals
The Zulu tribe
The Olmecs
The Indonesians
And hole lot of nations
and tribes
I Recommend you to go to this site: http://rupeenews.com/2007/11/27/reds-have-greed-roots/
An example of that site:
House and building Structures
Archaeological excavations conducted throughout North America and NorthAfrica reveala corresponding architecturalresemblance between ninthcentury buildings. The structure of a Berber house of the Atlas Mountains, Morocco , for instance, is exactly the same as that of a house in New Mexico . The same similarity can be traced between the Castle of Montezuma discovered in Arizona and the remnants found in Mesa Verdein Colorado and the general structure of Berber buildings .
and there is more evidence like: pictures of the buildings
arab world maps of that time and so on
visit that site and see for you're self
Before you say something wrong
Posted by: Akplayer | October 06, 2009 at 04:03 AM
Please also review "They Came Before Columbus" as well as Admiral Zeng He (Chinese Muslim).
Please note diaries of Christopher Columbus.
The Ponzone Brothers (Syrian Arab ancestry) were captain of at least two the ships.
Columbus sailed from Muslim Spain (where they were escaping the Inquisition)and many of the sailors were Muslim.
Mali ships also visited America before Columbus.
Sign of Muslim mosques have been found all over South America.
New Mexico carvings of Arabic words and images date back way before Columbus.
There is an entire bibliography on this posted on Rupee News
Editor Rupee News
http://www.rupeenews.com
Posted by: Moin Ansari | December 23, 2009 at 06:43 PM
Yes, there were africans and muslims here before the white man. It is hard for the man who forced his will upon the land of the original man in Africa and the original man in America to believe this. because of the white man arrogance and channel vision, he can't see past his own intentions.
Posted by: russell | December 31, 2009 at 08:15 PM
lol @ Muslims and Afrocentrics pushing their agendas onto American Indians and American Indian history. Face it, Islam and African Americans were in the Americas in post-colonial times.
Posted by: SKR | March 03, 2010 at 07:57 PM
A very narrow minded person who afraid to face the truth. He is blind folded by the wealth of the world and not ready to prepare for the after life. May Allah have mercy on him.
Posted by: pmcom | December 03, 2010 at 12:35 PM
You truly don't understand slavery or Islam. Islam opens the eyes of people making them better aware of their harsh situation. These people are more likely to run away.
Posted by: MrB | March 31, 2011 at 02:48 AM
for other supporting evidences, just googling "sequoyah" or "selocta". Then look at their dress! Is it Indianese dress or Arabian dress? You conclude it.
Posted by: Bruce | June 12, 2011 at 12:50 AM
The head "turban" was introduced as an interim headdress when a Cherokee delegation was taken to England. The coverings were left over from a previous delegation from India and used on the Cherokee then present because their appearance was too "shocking" for the fairy Euro types. lol @ Bruce and lol @ any misinformation to islamify Natives, man I tell ya.
Posted by: SKR | September 11, 2011 at 04:33 PM